Congress contribution

Predicting diagnoses with drug orders, routes and doses

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smi.31.00336
Publication Date: 10.09.2015

Beeler Patrick, Dalleur Olivia, Bates David

Please find the affiliations for this article in the PDF.

Introduction

Having structured diagnoses is crucial for inpatient treatment and has specific implications regarding clinical decision support (CDS) and billing. Nevertheless, most diagnoses are not electronically available until the coding staff review the patient charts, i.e., after discharge. This lack of structured data on diagnoses of hospitalised patients may affect the quality of care. However, electronic health records provide current, structured data on treatment orders and drug agents have been shown to be associated with medical conditions in the outpatient setting. As yet, little is known about associations of administration routes and doses with diagnoses, especially in inpatients. We compared the prediction of diagnoses using (i) drug orders alone vs drugs and routes, and (ii) drugs and routes vs drugs, routes and doses.

Methods

The study was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA. Inpatients, hospitalised in any ward, were included if they had been discharged between 1 Jan. 2012 and 31 Dec. 2012. All diagnoses coded according to the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) and data on all drugs related to these hospitalisations were obtained from the clinical information system in order to build drug-diagnosis pairs and then include stepwise route and dose. The dose was categorised into high (≥mean) and low (<mean). Only pairs present in ≥5 hospitalisations were analysed (‘support’). In order to compute the sensitivity and specificity of each association, hospital stays with the investigated drug-diagnosis pair (true positives), the drug only (false positives), only the diagnosis (false negatives), and with neither the drug nor the diagnosis (true negatives) were counted. These numbers were computed, first for the drug-diagnosis pairs, second for the drug-and-route-diagnosis pairs, and third for the drug-with-route-and-dose-diagnosis pairs. Theχ2 statistic was also calculated for each pair to indicate the corresponding prediction strength. Finally, the associations were juxtaposed, comparing (i) drug orders alone with drugs and routes, and (ii) drugs and routes with drugs, routes and doses. The difference between the χ2 statistics of the juxtaposed pairs allowed for the comparison and presentation of the improved prediction after including routes and doses.

Table 1

Top 10 out of 310 102 pairs: comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of drugs predicting diagnoses with drugs including route information.
Drug agentSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)By including this routeSensitivity (%)Specificity [%]Predicted diagnosisχ2 statistic gain by including route
Vancomycin82.580.9PO69.599.6Intestinal infection due to Clostridium difficile21 920.2
Acetylcysteine77.898.4IV72.299.9Poisoning by aromatic analgesics, not elsewhere classified10 587.0
Sodium chloride73.189.2INH36.899.8Cystic fibrosis with pulmonary manifestations9 100.0
Epinephrine54.698.4IM51.599.8Need for desensitisation to allergens8 497.0
Cromoglicic acid54.5100.0PO54.5100.0Congenital pigmentary anomalies of skin7 514.5
Rufinamide33.3100.0GTUBE or JTUBE33.3100.0Congenital quadriplegia7 348.4
Nalbuphine41.795.2IV37.699.3Outcome of delivery, single liveborn6 607.1
Paracetamol93.727.2PR50.895.7Acute posthaemorrhagic anaemia6 490.2
Ondansetron93.951.9PO84.693.5Encounter for antineoplastic chemotherapy6 459.0
Insulin (human)65.378.5IV44.797.4Acute posthaemorrhagic anaemia6 194.3

Results

A total of 55 095 hospital stays were analysed. The most common diagnoses were ‘unspecified essential hypertension’ (coded for 29.5% of stays), ‘other and unspecified hyperlipidaemia’ (16.9%), ‘oesophageal reflux’ (15.6%), ‘outcome of delivery, single liveborn’ (13.1%), and ‘personal history of tobacco use’ (12.6%). Most patients received pneumococcal vaccines (used in 74.8% hospitalisations), paracetamol (73.4%), docusate sodium (63.6%), oxycodone (52.8%) and ondansetron (48.8%). Overall, 745 distinct drug agents, 27 administration routes, 2 dose levels and 3 616 diagnoses formed prediction pairs. The comparison of the χ2 statistics of drugs predicting diagnoses showed substantial improvements after including the route (table 1). For example, the specificity of vancomycin predicting ‘intestinal infection due to Clostridium difficile’ increased 18.7% by including the route ‘peros’, though the sensitivity decreased by 13%. The most substantial χ2 gain due to further inclusion of dose information was calculated for high-dose diphenhydramine per os, associated with ‘outcome of delivery, single liveborn’, increasing the specificity by 21.6% and decreasing the sensitivity by only 0.4% (table 2).

Table 2

Top 10 out of 351 266 pairs: comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of drugs and routes predicting diagnoses with drugs including route and dose information.
Drug agentRouteSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)DoseUnitSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Predicted diagnosisχ2 statistic gain by including dose
DiphenhydraminePO92.676.7Highmg92.298.3Outcome of delivery, single liveborn30 120.2
Multivitamins1PO82.165.4HighTab62.899.9Cystic fibrosis with pulmonary manifestations21 686.6
Coagulation factor IXIV71.499.9HighUnit71.4100.0Congenital factor IX disorder14 500.5
OxycodonePO88.553.1Highmg84.584.1Outcome of delivery, single liveborn11 408.4
DiphenhydraminePO91.870.9Highmg91.290.6Other current conditions of mother, delivered310 455.2
Calcium folinatePO47.299.4Highmg47.2100.0Malignant neoplasm of long bones of lower limb9 969.4
EthambutolPO83.399.9Highmg83.3100.0Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis9 663.8
Multivitamins1PO70.265.4HighTab47.899.7Bronchiectasis with acute exacerbation9 042.6
PseudoephedrinePO61.399.6Highmg60.799.9Benign neoplasm of pituitary gland48 721.8
Multienzymes2PO87.999.2HighTab74.999.8Cystic fibrosis with pulmonary manifestations8 005.8
1 ‘Multivitamins, other combinations’

2 ‘Multienzymes (lipase, protease, etc.)’

3 ‘Other current conditions classifiable elsewhere of mother, delivered, with or without mention of antepartum condition’

4 ‘Benign neoplasm of pituitary gland and craniopharyngeal duct’

Discussion

We found that consideration of not only the drug, but also the route and the dose, had a substantial impact on the ability to predict inpatient diagnoses in real time. This has important implications: knowledge of the diagnoses early in the process may directly improve the quality of care; in addition, the present approach allows for automated pick lists displaying the most likely diagnoses, has the potential to minimise misunderstandings between healthcare professionals, to enable sophisticated CDS and to support efforts aiming to increase the completeness of problem lists.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Beeler was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Correspondence

Correspondence:

Dr. med. Patrick E. Beeler

Research Center for Medical Informatics

University Hospital Zurich

Rämistrasse 100

CH-8091 Zurich

Switzerland

patrick.beeler[at]usz.ch

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!

close